The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is advising economies around the globe to quit funding energy subsidies that breed fossil fuels that are harmful to the environment and shift to growth enhancing investment.
Nigeria, one of the largest oil producing countries of the world spends as much as N2.4 billion daily on fuel subsidies, reports indicates.
According to the IMF, fiscal policy makers should begin to focus more on pensions, education, healthcare, better infrastructure, technology, and climate change.
“Fiscal policymakers have their work cut out for them on many fronts. Whether you live in a rapidly aging advanced economy, or a low-income or emerging market economy with a young, booming population, all these issues matter for you,” the fund said in a blog post.
- McKinsey projects massive growth for Seplat, others on Africa’s rising…
- Embrace private sector to create jobs, boost economy, OCCIMA tells Imo govt
- Nigeria’s FX challenge on IATA radar, $450m airline funds held up
- Leadway Pensure targets double-digit returns on funds by year-end
- BOI, NGX partner to expand capital formation, attract new listings, investments
It said the fiscal monitor in April 2019 shows government policies on taxes and spending have to adapt and should shift to growth-enhancing investment. This means, for example, more money to build classrooms, hospitals and roads, while cutting wasteful spending, such as inefficient energy subsidies.
The IMF who said fossil fuel subsidies typically benefits the rich more than the poor explained that in its chart copied above, removing fossil fuel subsidies, could gain up to 4 percent of global GDP in additional resources over the medium term to invest in people, growth, and help protect the most vulnerable.
“We define the subsidies—which amount to 6.5 percent of GDP globally—broadly. The IMF’s calculations include both the government funding to artificially reduce the price of energy below cost (0.4 percent of global GDP) and the under taxation of fuel consumption (6.1 percent of global GDP), because energy consumption contributes to global warming, local pollution, increased traffic congestion and more accidents.
This money spent on other priorities can help raise long-term economic growth, which is a key ingredient to reduce the burden of high public debt. It can also spread economic benefits more widely within and across countries and help restore the public trust in institutions necessary for economic stability.”
The fund said it’s next fiscal monitor will focus on climate change. It will be published in October, according to the IMF.